A job applicant talks to a recruiter.
Models for explanatory purposes only.
The rejection email had one extra sentence that got me a job two months later
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.
The job-hunting process is not for the faint of heart. You have to be 100% comfortable with putting yourself out there to be rejected, and if you're not comfortable with that, you're going to be in a whole world of hurt. If you take every job rejection so personally that you can't bear to apply for another job until you emotionally recover, then you're never going to find a new job!
I totally understand why people get jaded during their job searches. Competent, professional people get rejected all the time for things that aren't necessarily negatives. If you've ever tried to apply to be a cashier at Taco Bell with a Master's degree, you know how it goes. You get rejected, not because you can't do the job, but because you're overqualified! A fast-food manager doesn't want to hire someone they know will quit in three months because they found something better. They want to hire somebody with no other options who will put up with bad working conditions and low pay. If somebody can get a Master's degree, they can probably find a job that pays them more than minimum wage. Or at least they should be able to.
When you get rejected for jobs you're hopelessly overqualified or underqualified for, you can more easily deduce why you got rejected. When you get rejected from a job that you seem to be a good fit for, it's much more of a mystery. A lot of recruiters won't be honest with you about why you didn't get the job. They either don't want to hurt your feelings, or they don't have time to give personalized feedback.
The recruiter in this story went above and beyond for this candidate, whom he ultimately rejected. He told her exactly why she didn't get the job, and although it initially hurt her feelings, she engaged with his feedback in good faith, and it paid back tenfold.
A job applicant talks to a recruiter.
Models for explanatory purposes only.
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.